Sunday, December 11, 2016

Assignment 16 - Kyle Hosey : How Doping Continues to Ruin the Integrity of Sports

How Doping Continues to Ruin the Integrity of Sports

            Anyone with younger siblings, tell me if this conversation sounds familiar. “Mommy, Ryan cheated at Sorry!” “No, you cheated!” “No, you!” From at a young age, all of us have a notion that even minor competitions like board games should be played on a level field. Most of our major sports are even played on level surfaces. Every game starts at 0-0. We naturally despise cheating in every form; why else would scandals like Deflategate and Pete Rose’s gambling become so public and drawn-out? Yet there is only one aspect of cheating in sports that threatens the idealism that we so cherish in sport, and it may be the one we care the least about. Performance enhancing drugs, or PEDs, have the potential to destroy sports as we know them, not betting on baseball or deflated footballs. However, all but the most shocking doping scandals, like Biogenesis in baseball, are always overshadowed by Deflategate-esque events. Perhaps we find it difficult to care because there is no easy fix; doping is a far deeper and more complex issue than any other in the sports world. But even if stamping out PEDs entirely seems impossible – and it is – to not make the effort is to allow cheating to destroy the integrity of sports.
            No matter the level of competition, all athletes are always searching for the competitive edge that gives them even the tiniest leg up. Artificially enhancing the human body’s abilities through PEDs is an unfortunate manifestation of that underlying truth. The lengths to which some athletes go to gain that edge borders on the ridiculous at times. In the 1998 Olympics, Canadian snowboarder Ross Rebagliati temporarily had his gold medal stripped by the International Olympic Committee, after he failed a drug test. Some compared him to Ben Johnson, the Canadian sprinter who lost his medal in 1988 after testing positive for steroids. But the performance enhancing drug that he had been caught using wasn’t steroids. It was marijuana. No, really. According to Robin Williams, the only way marijuana is a performance enhancing drug is if there’s a giant Hershey’s bar at the end of the run. But Rebagliati, for whatever reason, thought using marijuana would help him perform, so that’s exactly what he did. The IOC eventually reinstated his medal, presumably realizing that declaring marijuana a PED was absolutely ridiculous. More recently, in 2009, the World Anti Doping Administration, or WADA, commissioned a study at Miami University into the possible use of sildenafil as a PED. Sildenafil – I swear I’m not making this up – is the active ingredient in Viagra. Besides giving double meaning to the term “performance enhancing”, according to ESPN, the study revealed that Viagra can actually provide miniscule benefits to athletes at extreme altitudes. While it is not currently a banned substance and no athlete has been found to be using Viagra as a PED, the fact that the world’s foremost regulatory agency felt compelled to study its effects speaks for itself. Clearly, some athletes will go to any and all lengths to find the smallest advantage. The two cases I just mentioned sound extreme; no, they are extreme. They are certainly harebrained and ridiculous, but only because they either don’t work or offer so small an advantage that they don’t matter. But anabolic steroids? Human growth hormone? Those and other common PEDs offer a clear advantage to its users, and the motivation to take advantage of them comes from the same place as the outlandish schemes I just mentioned. Athletes like Alex Rodriguez and Lance Armstrong will always exist as long as there are illicit ways to gain a competitive edge. On an individual basis, that is simply a fact of life, but it is a reality that we can deal with.          
            The real damage to sport’s integrity occurs when doping becomes institutionalized and normalized. This process goes back to the time of the Cold War, when state-sanctioned doping programs got their start. According to Thomas Hunt in his book Drug Games, prowess in sport became a method of projecting power, both in the US and in Russia. Just as in individual doping cases, the desire to win led national sporting federations to ignore positive results or even directly supply athletes with PEDs. Though Hunt notes that governments have since become more involved in regulating PED use among their athletes, Russia seems not to have gotten the message. You may remember that the Russian track and field team was banned from competing in the Rio Olympics due to an ongoing WADA investigation. Some of the details were released within the last month, and they are astonishing. According to the WADA report, the doping violations of Russian athletes were ordered to “disappear” by the Russian Ministry of Sport before and during the 2014 Sochi Olympics. Any positive test results were tampered with and replaced with clean samples. The report also alleges that Russian athletes were directly supplied with PEDs by the ministry. Around 1000 Russian athletes competing in both the Winter and Summer Games allegedly benefited from the manipulation of test results. It is not unreasonable to assume that this kind of blatant cheating at the national level is not limited to Russia. One hopes that the organizing and regulatory bodies, such as WADA and the IOC, have the power and the inclination to halt institutional doping. The course of the same WADA investigation of Russian doping suggests otherwise. WADA was first alerted to the possibility of wrongdoing by whistleblower Vitaliy Stepanov, who worked for the Russian anti-doping agency Rusada at the time. In a 2015 interview for a German documentary, Stepanov claimed that in spite of the overwhelming evidence he had submitted, WADA refused to investigate inside Russia at the time. That kind of institutional apathy is the true threat to doping-free sport. No amount of testing will stop the proliferation of PED use if even regulatory bodies do not have an incentive to stop it. The individual dopers, the national federations, and organizing bodies certainly have no incentive. International embarrassment always follows doping scandals, and organizing bodies lose money if their events are impacted by them.
            To this point, I have told you that not only will individual athletes always dope, but also that doping is still institutionalized and viewed apathetically by national federations and regulatory bodies. Doping seems to be so ingrained into the world of sports that some have suggested giving up and allowing all PED use. Health risks aside, that “solution” is a dangerous and easy cop out. The idea of the level playing field is our most fundamental ideal in sport, perhaps in our society as a whole. We believe in ability and training deciding the victor, not artificial enhancements. Allowing PEDs merely ensures that clean athletes will be forced to dope to keep up, utterly destroying any semblance of that integrity in sport. Avoiding that fate means empowering the regulatory agencies like WADA to contain and punish both individual and institutional doping. But all the regulatory powers we can possibly confer will have no affect at all if we remain apathetic about PED use. Make an effort to hate doping as much as we all hated our siblings for looking at our ships during Battleship.  This is the greatest threat to the fairness and idealism that makes sports so captivating. It’s time sports fans start treating it that way.

Sources
Seppelet, Hajo. YouTube. ARD, 27 Apr 2015. Web. Jun. 2016.


Hunt, Thomas and John Hoberman. Drug Games: The International Olympic Committee and the Politics of Doping, 1960-2008. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2011. Print.




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.